As the information
under my picture suggests, I am a fan of people who devote their lives to
unpopular causes. Perhaps I should add: even
if I disagree with them.
I applaud actress
Kirsten Dunst for speaking up about femininity and the definition of womanhood
(even if I don’t entirely agree with how she defines these things):
I feel like the feminine has been a
little undervalued. We all have to get our own jobs and make our own money, but
staying at home, nurturing, being the mother, cooking—it's a valuable thing my
mom created. And sometimes you need your knight in shining armor. I'm sorry.
You need a man to be a man and a woman to be a woman. That's why relationships
work.
I occasionally read
PluggedIn movie reviews. It’s sponsored by Focus on the Family, but the reviews
can be snarky and funny. I take issue with their response to Ms. Dunst’s words:
“[Dunst’s] viewpoint is increasingly
challenged these days, and it's harder and harder to see the proper path
forward while still holding tight to the past, to the traditions God Himself
initiated.”
Read their full
article here. Some of the comments are excellent.
My head is spinning
as I try to remember where in the Bible it states that all women must be
stay-at-home mothers and let their husbands be the sole breadwinners. I don’t
even recall where it states that all women HAVE to become mothers. As a
soon-to-be-married woman who doesn’t want kids (for now), it troubles me to
think of the reactions I might face when I try shopping for a new church where
my fiancé lives. Any attitude suggesting women have to be this or that is an
automatic dealbreaker.
I cannot understand
how it’s “unbiblical” for marriages to be treated as partnerships, where each
couple makes decisions that are best for them and their families; why it’s
considered unreasonable in many conservative circles for men to help out with
chores and child-rearing; why a woman choosing to have a career is accused of
neglecting her children. I went to daycare as a kid while my mom worked; I think
I turned out okay. When my dad got sick and had to retire, mom took over
financially. Do ultra-conservatives somehow believe they are above that
possibility?
But no matter which path
you choose, there is disdain to be met at every turn. The disdain for women who
choose to be stay-at-home mothers is also backlash in the face of feminism. It
has to stop.
I can’t deny that
these attitudes have a direct impact on my faith and the way I relate to Jesus.
Even though I firmly believe Jesus valued women (he saved the life of one about
to be stoned for adultery, per Old Testament law, after all), if other
Christians who claim to represent him cannot allow for equality in their
definition of womanhood, then the result is simple: the church will have no
women.
Respect, dignify, and
above all, listen to individual women and their stories, or we leave the
church. Engage with us in discussion and consider the impact of our leadership
skills, or we leave the church. Maybe not all of us in droves, but this
particular woman will pack her bags if things do not change.
I know this wouldn’t happen
on a large enough scale to wake people up. Sadly, there are plenty of women
perpetuating anti-feminist viewpoints, because they have never been taught what
feminism is supposed to be: a radical notion that women are people; an idea
that goes beyond politics, religious differences, and social status.
Ironically, I have
met more women lately who actively promote patriarchy (like this woman who told me "We don't need feminism in America!"). They look at me like I’m
holding a dead squirrel when I dare to admit I am a feminist. That, too, must
stop.
Always have to wear with a cross. Always.
http://sbethcaplin.blogspot.com/2014/04/theres-fly-in-soup-there-is-patriarchy.html
ReplyDelete