Monday, June 3, 2013

Modesty is not a "woman's problem"

A friend of mine posted this article on modesty on Facebook recently. It's a timely article, since bikini season has just begun. As a woman and a Christian, I understand the point that this writer is trying to make: as a kindness to our male brothers in Christ, we ladies should cover up to keep them from lusting after our exposed bodies. That's a message I was given as a college student in Bible study, and didn't think to question it. But now I wonder...

Why aren't more women offended by the notion that modesty is a problem exclusive to our gender?

I brought this up once at dinner while on a church retreat. I was sitting at a table with half a dozen other women, and somehow the issue of modesty came up. We talked about the double standards at play: how women are lectured to cover up so the guys don't go crazy, but no one seems to care about telling guys to pull up their pants or put on T-shirts at the pool. Are men the only ones who get visually stimulated?

Because I lack a mental filter, I spoke up and added my no-cents: "There's this one guy who goes to our church, and I've seen every pair of boxers he owns. And no, we're not dating!" It took me a few seconds to realize why everyone was looking at me funny. But, my point stands (when taken in context): as far as I know, no staff member told this dude to pull his pants up a few inches to spare the ladies a lust-fest.

But this post isn't to remind the Church that women have libidos too: it's about why modesty is important in the first place. If you read the article above, the author makes a big deal about pointing out that women need to "be kind" to their brothers in Christ by wearing more fabric at the beach. Clearly, she's never heard of the expression "Less is more."

How do magazines like Maxim and the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue, which show just-barely covered models, stay in business when there's magazines like Playboy to compete with? Not to mention, naked women are at our disposal these days, thanks to the internet. But some guys (so I've been told) like to use their imaginations. And as long as the imagination can function, does it really matter whether a girl is wearing a bikini or a scuba suit?

The article fails to take into consideration that lust is a heart issue, not a clothing issue. Men are capable of lusting equally after women in bikinis and woman in burquas. There are far more convincing reasons to encourage young girls to embrace modesty, without shaming them into believing that their bodies are shameful stumbling blocks. I don't want to preach about the Christian stance on modesty -- we've all heard it, to some degree -- so I'll just share why I choose to embrace modesty:

I choose modesty because I believe my body has worth. I want to be selective about who I allow to see it. I choose modesty because, to an extent, my choice of clothing says something about my character. It's why I dress up for job interviews instead of showing up in pajamas (Don't read too much into that statement, though. I am not saying that women who dress provocatively have poor character. And any guy who whistles at a woman and expects to get sex from her because she's wearing a low-cut shirt is a toolbag).

Bottom line: I'm modest out of respect for myself and the body God gave me. I am not modest for the sake of other guys. Contrary to what that blogger says, I am not responsible for the choices they make. Did anyone ever consider how maybe men give in so easily to lustful fantasies because we set low standards for them to aspire to? It's not *just* about biology.

It's deeply saddening to see young girls buying into the idea that modesty is some kind of punishment, simply because the features we are born with are deemed attractive by the opposite sex. Not only that, but this line of thinking contributes to the idea that "men can't help themselves," which is a common excuse used to justify rape.

That blogger wants to talk about the huge "sacrifice" she's making by not wearing two-piece bathing suits; seriously? Let's talk to the men to "sacrifice" turning their heads around to stare, shall we?

Women deserve better than that. Modesty is not our problem.

5 comments:

  1. I agree with you that men (and women) are ultimately responsible for what they choose to imagine and do, but there is still merit in choosing to dress and act modestly for the sake of others.

    The first point I want to make is that modesty/immodesty is more than a question of clothes a person wears, and I, personally, have never been under an illusion that it's a girls-only problem (guys need to put on shirts and pull up pants just as much as girls do). I've always thought of immodesty as when a person's attitude, appearance, or actions demonstrate the implication (intentional or not) that they want to be objectified or sought after, whether or not it's demonstrated through clothing. If someone puts their body on display, that usually sends a message that they are okay, to at least some degree, with it being looked at and objectified. It doesn't forgive people for treating them disrespectfully, but respecting someone is a lot easier when their lifestyle makes it clear that they want respect.

    I think the cake analogy Rachel Clark posted was excellent. Dressing provocatively around a guy is like following someone on a diet around with a chocolate cake. Even in that situation, though, the responsibility falls on the dieter to refrain from eating the cake. However, it isn't unreasonable to ask the person holding the cake to put it away -- not just for their own benefit, but out of sake of the dieter facing the temptation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right, I believe, in the honesty of your words. Then again, once a man has "an idea" in his mind it can begin buzzing around in his mind until it just might take over his waking thoughts. THAT is temptation. - sincerely, Michael Skoch.

      Delete
  2. I've got some chocolate cake for you...seriously. It's a chocolate cake. It's not even a Bikini Atoll! So, tops off and hats off to ....!

    ReplyDelete
  3. On modesty: you have an issue with modesty? What sort of issue does modesty have to do with passion, analogies, or anything else in the world today? When two are together in privacy, modesty should go out the window. Sincerely, Michael Skoch. Post Script: I've met a chocolate cake, anonymous, and you're no chocolate cake. The end...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello my name is stella best from
    usai know
    a spell caster
    who helped me when i had
    problem with
    my lover. if you
    need a right place to solve your
    problems
    contact DR
    SUJU SPELL TEMPLE is the right
    choice. he is a
    great man that have been
    casting spells with
    years of
    experience. he cast spells for
    different
    purposes like
    (1) If you want your ex back.
    (2) if you always have bad
    dreams.
    (3) You want to be promoted in
    your office.
    (4) You want women/men to
    run after you.
    (5) If you want a child.
    (6) You want to be rich.
    (7) You want to tie your
    husband/wife to be
    yours forever.
    (8) If you need financial
    assistance.
    (9) Herbal care
    (10) If you can be able to satisfy
    your wife
    sex desire due
    to low erraction.
    (11) if your menstruation refuse
    to come
    out the day it
    suppose or over flows.
    (12) if your work refuse to pay
    your, people
    owing you?.
    (13) solve a land issue and get it
    back.
    (14) Did your family Denny you
    of your
    right?
    (15) Let people obey my words
    and do my
    which.
    (16) Do you have a low sperm
    count?
    (17) Case solve E.T.C
    free to contact him at
    {Drsujuspelltem ple@gmail.com.

    ReplyDelete