Feminism is a funny word in my vocabulary. For as long as I can remember, "feminism" is defined as this crazy, radical idea that women are human beings, and should be treated as much...meaning they are entitled to the same rights and privileges as men. Can't say I disagree with that definition, but unfortunately, that's not what is commonly associated with "feminism" when people hear it today.
I've been in the church long enough to have heard the rants of evangelicals, accusing feminism as the great destroyer of families, usurping traditional male duties, etc. I don't buy into those. I think there have been some unexpected consequences of the feminist movement, such as teaching women to have sex "like men" (without strings), and as long as both genders can get away with it, then that's equality. Feminists, from a stereotypical standpoint, tend to be in favor of abortion, which I am most definitely not. I believe there is nothing more feminine than a mother wanting to protect her child, in the womb and out. Consequently, I've avoided the label of "feminist" because I didn't want to have assumptions made about me that weren't true.
If I call myself a feminist, the evangelicals will call me a heretic. If I don't call myself a feminist, the rest of the world will see me as anti-woman. Are those my only options? I hope not, because they kind of suck. Clearly one side of the spectrum, or perhaps both, is misinformed.
Yet here I am, crusading for advocacy against rape culture, and appealing to the minds of liberals and conservatives alike. In this, we are all equally vulnerable. So that leaves me to question my beliefs about what I think feminism is...and why I'm so apprehensive to call myself one. Because really, as a woman, there must be something fundamentally wrong with me if I can't identify as such.
I'm rereading Jonalyn Fincher's book "Ruby Slippers," which addresses the Christian approach to femininity and women's roles in the church (and it's fantastic, for those who haven't read it). Throughout history, Christianity and feminism have not gone well together. So it seems I have another hurdle to jump when it comes to reconciling my feminist opinions, because I subscribe to the teachings of a holy book with passages by the Apostle Paul that say women must not speak up in church. At the same time, the first witnesses to Jesus' empty tomb were women. In an age when a woman's testimony was considered worthless, why would the Gospel writers have named Mary Magdalene as the first witness, and not someone more credible? If the resurrection never happened, that's a bad way to try and convince people that it did.
If people are wrong about Christianity being a misogynistic religion, then I'm probably wrong about my reasons for avoiding calling myself a feminist.
Maybe, just maybe, people of all religious and political persuasions can agree that feminism is about discovering what it means to be female. How to be feminine in a society that favors men, and not see that as a weakness. How to maintain a healthy identity when fashion magazines try to sell us beauty in a package, when toddlers in tiaras are in such a hurry to grow up, but women in their thirties are desperate to look younger. Most importantly, maybe feminism is about how to feel like a "real woman" even if you don't have much in the way of curves, haven't had sex, aren't married, or in a relationship, and despise dressing up. Maybe it's about appreciating the differences of both genders, instead of trying to make them one and the same, because we're not the same. We're made differently, we think differently. Or maybe it's about trying to find that common ground.
So. Am I completely crazy, or might I be on to something?
I don't see anything Biblical about the sort of "feminism" spoken of in this article, but I do think it's a tricky road to start wondering down. I do believe that there's nothing wrong with a woman who works... none the less... not at the expense of sending our kids on the big yellow prison bus to learn from Caesar. And then we wonder why they backslide in college... It's not a difficult concept. "Knowledge begins with the fear of the Lord." We are responsible, not to shelter our children away from the world, but to teach them. Timothy and Titus even say that a man's ability to lead in the church depends on his families behavior as much as his (even if we ignore this in America). Christian schools test scores are significantly higher than public schools, and home schooling yields better results than both. I'm not saying that sending your kids off to school is bad in all scenarios, but I'm saying that the Word of God is useful in all scenarios as a guide, and that Mom and Dad both need to free up more time to spend with their children to teach them. This is one example of where a strict feminist approach could get us into trouble. But it's difficult for us gentleman,too. If I believe that there's only enough time for one parent to work while still educating my children, and if I marry a woman who feels the same... then the Bible calls me "worse than an unbeliever" if I don't provide for my family. That's a lot of pressure in a world where success seems directly correlated to 15 years of school performance, where coincidentally the girls did their homework and the guys played video games.
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous,
DeleteFree advice, schooling today plays at Girls vs. Boys dialectic, even certain of the private Christian schools, no matter the test scores. "Feminist" homeschooling or public "feminist" schooling? Caesar's money is Money. Gold makes the rules today, as ever. Book VII in The Republic of Plato discusses dialectic, line 522. That's the cornerstone of Elementary schooling. Read your Bible closer. Cite your Bible verses and chapters from your biblical translation in your reply because I am scared witless of the LORD. How "worse than an unbeliever", then, are you for working and educating your child in your one-parent home when a Bible's in it?
The letters of Timothy and Titus you mentioned are addressed to the far flung churches around the Mediterranean (Paul wrote them to the churches there)a very long time ago, before the KJV. Lay off the Xbox "gentleman,too" and backslide all you want to. -Michael Skoch.
P.S. When you get free advice you get what you pay for.
The Christian school vs public school argument is a completely different tangent from what this post is talking about. But for the record, I went to public school and turned out just fine. I'm not naive enough to believe that the shenanigans taking place in public schools don't happen in Christian schools, either. Morality and Christian values is my job as a parent to teach, not the classroom. And there is nothing unbiblical about wanting to use the degree I paid $40,000 for. Nothing in the Bible condemns daycare or hiring a nanny. I went to daycare as a kid, and again, I turned out just fine. Nowhere have I advocated a "strict feminist approach" to anything. I have no idea what a "strict feminist approach" even means.
ReplyDeleteBut thanks for commenting!
Sarahbeth Caplin,
DeleteFeminism does not laugh. I read both your books after buying them on amazon.com and they helped me. The feminists I know, Jamie and her husband Chien, Planned Parenthood employees are unkind. Abortion is evil. You should ask them about it.
Public school does not prepare its pupils in truth. (I graduated from Cleveland State University (of errors) after Kent State and Bay Village High School in Ohio. The Bible says that you can't serve two masters. When I was at Catholic Mass and went to public school I was unprepared for learning about what went into the feminism and abortion industries.
I'm not sorry for taking up your time with this reply to your post and really did approve of and appreciate both of your books. I did follow your column when you wrote for kentwired, and am ambushed constantly by the online world. The first reply to your column I'd answer: Video games are boring. Baseball. Reading books. Drinking coffee. No debt. You're not crazy to question feminism as an ideal. It is someone else's ideal worldview. It is all words--sophism with a bankroll that pays itself and runs the money around public schools.- sincerely, Michael Skoch
Caplin,
ReplyDeleteWhen the new testament passages you refer to state that women are not to speak in church (or service) they also make reference to the covering of heads. Do the men cover their heads during the service, or do the women? Why do the women not speak during the service (or church)? Look into that more closely. The women cover their heads "because of the angels." On what ground do feminists stand when it comes down to that sort of question?....misogyny or scholasticism/scholasticism or feminism answer the same way, (or at least until recently) by saying "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin." Hebrew religion has women rabbis? How did they answer those questions, do they still wish to? Read and pay attention. If you read the new testament and gospels with open eyes you can see that women are not excluded at all! If it were a magdalene who was a witness...a witness!...how could a "feminist" be angry about that? I've no greek, but a translation of the greek sounding term misogyny might be: dislike of the female reproductive biology to the extremes of hatred. Could a translation of a translation of a transliteration by a scribe taught by a pharisee and handed down by generations be any more baffling in modern English than the first ten books of the old testament, the histories, or the prophets? There's food for thought! Slowly, please. Sincerely, Michael Skoch.
Jn 14:26 New American Bible Catholic Book Publishing Company
ReplyDeleteSarahbeth,
ReplyDeleteLook at Luke 1,2.
Sincerely, Michael Skoch.
Heya! I'm at work browsing your blog from my new iphone 3gs! Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts! Keep up the outstanding work!
ReplyDeleteMy homepage ... tooth health
you are actually a just right webmaster. The website loading speed is
ReplyDeleteamazing. It kind of feels that you're doing any distinctive trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you've done a
wonderful job on this topic!
Here is my web page ... what is dental health
Hmm is anyone else having problems with the images on this blog loading?
ReplyDeleteI'm trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it's the blog.
Any feed-back would be greatly appreciated.
Check out my website: body building training
I've read several just right stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how so much attempt you put to make such a fantastic informative web site.
ReplyDeleteMy blog post: natural cures for allergies
Healthy teeth, dental health, body building training, natural cures for allergies...health and happiness, wealth and mental health. Dare anyone click on...those topics? My cure for mental health and wealth is to post comments on blogs. Without body building training I have achieved a couple hundred pounds weight and what is dental health to a man with all his teeth, healthy or no? I should be paid for this post, so don't take it down and read my other blog postings, I am going to consume some food now, the brush my teeth, then go out for a walk, then pump some weights. Good luck and good day.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry, I've just come back from my walk and found that I'm allergic to exercise. It was a five star walk, but it hurt my feet. Perhaps I need shoes with a thicker sole, or maybe an instep pad for my arches. Thank you, Good night.
ReplyDeleteIt occurred to me, Anonymous and Consumer reports, that feminists often wear sensible shoes. Please address that topic in your next exchange.
ReplyDelete