Sarahbeth Caplin
Author of young adult fiction, memoir, and poetry
Monday, May 19, 2014
Same author, different site
So, in an effort to start treating my writing less like a hobby and more like a business, I have created my own web domain! Follow me at www.sbethcaplin.com.
Monday, May 12, 2014
Same kind of Christian as me?
Some people are of
the opinion that one needs to be a certain age or have a certain amount of “life
experience” before they earn the right to write a memoir.
I’m 25 and wrote my
first memoir at 22. I’m contemplating writing a second.
The only reason I’m
considering this is because the kind of memoir I am interested in reading does
not exist. At least not that I know of.
There are a
plethora of memoirs out there about finding faith, losing it, and the grueling
process of finding it again (see Addie Zierman’s When We Were on Fire,
Elizabeth Esther’s Girl at the End of the World, and Rachel Held Evans’ Faith Unraveled for some awesome examples). But one thing these women have in common is
their faith journey began in a church from early childhood. If you know me at
all, you know that is not my life.
I want to read more
books about people who chose Christianity after growing up in an environment
that was staunchly against it.
I want to read more
books about people who continue to choose Christianity despite the inevitable
bumper-car effect of old cultural mores clashing with new ones; of old lingo
that doesn’t jell with a new spiritual vocabulary; and the Pariah Syndrome that
comes with being one of few people in your church with this particular
background, which you are not ashamed of, but refuse to talk about because you
are a person who desires to make friends, not some Show and Tell presentation.
If those books
exist, I have yet to find them. It is my hope that if I were to write a book
like this, it will bring other people with similar experiences out of the
woodwork and into my favorite coffee shop to talk to me.
As of now, the
people who share or at least relate to these experiences live in my laptop, not
in my city. They can be found in organizations like Christians for Biblical
Equality, but they live all over the world, not down the street.
The idea of “biblical
equality” started with the idea that women can and should be able to lead
people as male pastors do. But I want to take this definition further and
expand it for people who worship differently than the “mainstream” Christian
does: people who find standing during worship songs uncomfortable (and
sometimes the lyrics tacky); people who feel squeamish when asked to pray out
loud before a group; people who long for community but feel excluded because
they aren’t extroverted or “outwardly spiritual” enough.
“Biblical equality”
can mean that your worship is as valid and meaningful as my worship. I don’t
see this idea expressed often enough.
I’m currently
working on a piece that I hope to submit to a popular blogger as a guest post,
so it won’t appear on my blog yet. But I hope to use it as a starting point for
the maybe-memoir I might write. Because when it comes to improving community
and making all members of the body of Christ feel welcome, there’s not enough
paper in the world to discuss it.
Sunday, May 4, 2014
Drunk texting and the complexities of human nature
A
thirty-two-year-old woman is killed while updating her Facebook status behind
the wheel of a moving car, and the Internet is flooding with opinions.
Reactions span
everywhere from “She deserves a Darwin award” to “How would YOU like your
entire life to be judged based on one mistake?”
Talk about
extremes. One could rationally argue that Facebooking while driving is more a deliberate
choice than a “mistake,” but I can understand the sentiment behind it: no one wants to be
remembered solely for the wrongs they committed. Our lives should be more than cautionary tales.
But I have to
wonder if the same amount of compassion would be shown if the truck driver she
hit was critically injured or killed. Or if she plowed into a family’s minivan
and killed all the children inside.
Then she’d be a
monster. Right?
This idea of how we
define “good” and “bad,” especially when the person in question is deceased and
cannot redeem or justify their actions, appeals to me because it’s the primary topic
in my upcoming book. Where There’s Smoke
is full of flawed characters who want to believe they are good. And they do try;
but the ways they go about proving themselves make others scratch their heads
at best, and feel betrayed at worst. It’s a story that asks: who are we really?
Are we the sum of all our actions? Is the note we finish our lives on the most
defining of them all?
There are no right
or wrong ways to answer this question, and that’s what I love about it.
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
There's a fly in the soup; there is patriarchy in my religion
As the information
under my picture suggests, I am a fan of people who devote their lives to
unpopular causes. Perhaps I should add: even
if I disagree with them.
I applaud actress
Kirsten Dunst for speaking up about femininity and the definition of womanhood
(even if I don’t entirely agree with how she defines these things):
I feel like the feminine has been a
little undervalued. We all have to get our own jobs and make our own money, but
staying at home, nurturing, being the mother, cooking—it's a valuable thing my
mom created. And sometimes you need your knight in shining armor. I'm sorry.
You need a man to be a man and a woman to be a woman. That's why relationships
work.
I occasionally read
PluggedIn movie reviews. It’s sponsored by Focus on the Family, but the reviews
can be snarky and funny. I take issue with their response to Ms. Dunst’s words:
“[Dunst’s] viewpoint is increasingly
challenged these days, and it's harder and harder to see the proper path
forward while still holding tight to the past, to the traditions God Himself
initiated.”
Read their full
article here. Some of the comments are excellent.
My head is spinning
as I try to remember where in the Bible it states that all women must be
stay-at-home mothers and let their husbands be the sole breadwinners. I don’t
even recall where it states that all women HAVE to become mothers. As a
soon-to-be-married woman who doesn’t want kids (for now), it troubles me to
think of the reactions I might face when I try shopping for a new church where
my fiancé lives. Any attitude suggesting women have to be this or that is an
automatic dealbreaker.
I cannot understand
how it’s “unbiblical” for marriages to be treated as partnerships, where each
couple makes decisions that are best for them and their families; why it’s
considered unreasonable in many conservative circles for men to help out with
chores and child-rearing; why a woman choosing to have a career is accused of
neglecting her children. I went to daycare as a kid while my mom worked; I think
I turned out okay. When my dad got sick and had to retire, mom took over
financially. Do ultra-conservatives somehow believe they are above that
possibility?
But no matter which path
you choose, there is disdain to be met at every turn. The disdain for women who
choose to be stay-at-home mothers is also backlash in the face of feminism. It
has to stop.
I can’t deny that
these attitudes have a direct impact on my faith and the way I relate to Jesus.
Even though I firmly believe Jesus valued women (he saved the life of one about
to be stoned for adultery, per Old Testament law, after all), if other
Christians who claim to represent him cannot allow for equality in their
definition of womanhood, then the result is simple: the church will have no
women.
Respect, dignify, and
above all, listen to individual women and their stories, or we leave the
church. Engage with us in discussion and consider the impact of our leadership
skills, or we leave the church. Maybe not all of us in droves, but this
particular woman will pack her bags if things do not change.
I know this wouldn’t happen
on a large enough scale to wake people up. Sadly, there are plenty of women
perpetuating anti-feminist viewpoints, because they have never been taught what
feminism is supposed to be: a radical notion that women are people; an idea
that goes beyond politics, religious differences, and social status.
Ironically, I have
met more women lately who actively promote patriarchy (like this woman who told me "We don't need feminism in America!"). They look at me like I’m
holding a dead squirrel when I dare to admit I am a feminist. That, too, must
stop.
Always have to wear with a cross. Always.
Monday, April 7, 2014
When cynicism throws coffee in your face
While some days are
worse than others, I’ve been stuck in an “I hate people” funk for over a year.
I’ve had so many moments where I questioned my decision to stay in Colorado,
because I left my closest friends in Cleveland. Not a large number of people,
but a select few I know I can count on in dire circumstances. Tell secrets to.
Look stupid in front of.
It’s been a slow
process finding those people in Denver. Today, at my favorite coffee shop,
someone I know from seminary waved at me from across the room like I was her
best friend – someone who repeatedly told me, “Let’s get coffee!” but never
responded to a single call or text about when to make that happen.
I hate people, I thought as I waved back.
The only table that
happened to be available was tucked in a corner. Not my favorite spot, but an
outlet and bathroom were nearby: two absolute necessities. I set up camp there,
preparing to stay there for a few hours editing the first draft of my
newest manuscript. With my laptop open and headphones in (even with no music
playing) I’m pretty sure I had my DO NOT DISTURB ME vibes in full motion.
I typed furiously
for about thirty minutes when I looked up, and saw someone I didn’t know (could have been
my age, but I’m horrible at guessing people’s ages) saying something in my
direction. Initially annoyed, I ripped out my headphones and said, “Yes?” as politely as I could muster.
“I’ve seen you here
before,” she said. “I was wondering if maybe you wanted to join me and my
friend at that table over there?”
She points to the
table I always hope to get when I come here – but it was occupied when I
arrived.
I weighed my options:
how much editing will I get done if I’m
sitting with two people who will expect me to make some kind of introduction
about myself? But then again, how choosy can I afford to be when people are
attempting to make friends with me?
Honestly? Not
very. It’s been easier to keep to myself
to avoid disappointment and stick to my best “friends” that only exist in
books. But something about this person’s face convinced me this was a chance I
had to take.
Screw your paranoia, Sarahbeth. Go make some friends. So I packed up my
stuff, and joined their table.
I did get some editing done: not as much as I
would have liked, but the time lost on that project was made up for with
riveting discussion about whether it’s polite to eavesdrop on conversations
that are happening a mere few feet away from you, and if people have the right
to be offended if you insert your own opinion, because there’s no such thing as
an expectation of private conversation in crowded coffeehouses.
“Sometimes I can’t
help but say something,” I told my new tablemates, *Susie and *Milton. “Depends on the subject matter. If people are
showing extreme ignorance then I feel like it’s an obligation. Because stupid
can be contagious.”
And this, Sarahbeth, is why you don’t have a
lot of friends. That kind of honesty gets you in trouble.
“That’s hilarious,”
laughed Milton. Leaning toward Susie, he asked, “Where did you find this one?”
“Back in that
corner,” Susie answered, smiling.
We didn’t leave
exchanging numbers or Facebook usernames, but we did part with an expectation
that “maybe we’ll run into each other again sometime.”
I have no idea if I’ll
ever see those two again. But even if I don’t, it’s nice to be reminded every
now and then that people are capable of surprising you.
If you're able to read this, you're not actually "poor"
There’s quite a bit
to get pissed off about when scrolling through Facebook updates, but this
article really got me: an article about the top ten most “useless” college majors. “Uselessness” was essentially defined by how much – or rather, how
little – you’d earn from any job in those fields.
Surprise surprise,
English Literature was up there (but surprisingly not the most worthless: that
honor went to journalism, my second choice of majors). But what articles like that fail to take into consideration
is the motivation for choosing such majors: clearly, you have to be more
motivated by passion than money.
Maybe I would be
financially better off in an accounting job, or marketing. I’d be richer, but a
lot more miserable. Those jobs are a good fit for plenty of people, but I’d be
putting my gifts and talents to waste in an environment like that.
Realizing my
student loan payments begin in June, and that the only somewhat steady job I’ve
had lately is babysitting, articles like that can instantly ruin my day. Consequently, I’ve been thinking a lot about worth and where
it comes from: how much of my identity is defined by what I “do,” and how I’m
going to weather the judgments of strangers I meet at social gatherings who
scoff when I tell them “I’m a writer!” (Which is precisely why I don’t go to
many social gatherings).
At one point in my
life, I judged people who were “just” waitresses, or “just” Starbucks baristas.
“Who would want to be stuck doing that
for a living?” I’d wonder. But that was well before I found myself struggling
to keep my head afloat in the working world. That was when I still lived at
home with my parents and never had to pay for anything myself.
I’ve grown up a bit
since then: and I’ve been considerably humbled, since my next day job may very
well be – surprise! – Starbucks. At least until book sales pick up. *crosses
fingers*
It helps to
remember that status and job titles don’t matter a whole lot when I never have
to doubt where my next meal is coming from: I make enough to at least have
those at my disposal. People in third-world countries aren’t so fortunate.
Maybe that’s an extreme comparison, but when the majority of the world lives
below the poverty line, it’s a wake-up call. It makes me less likely to
complain because I’m a few dollars short of meeting up with a friend for a beer
after a long workday. It humbles me to realize that while I may not earn enough
book royalties to quit my day job (whatever that will be), I still have the freedom
to publish what I want, when I want. That’s a priceless gift right there.
I write these words
in hopes that I will convince myself of their truth, and remember my true worth
as a daughter of God; someone’s fiancé; a close friend to a handful of really
awesome people.
Monday, March 31, 2014
On meeting Anna Nalick and my second book-iversary
This last weekend
may go down as the most epic in Beth soon-to-be Stoneburner history: I bought
my wedding dress, met Anna Nalick, and reflected on the 2nd
anniversary of my first book baby, Confessions of a Prodigal Daughter.
For those who have never heard of Amazing Anna (and sadly, many people haven’t, since she left her old record label several years ago), Anna Nalick is a self-described “indie
artist,” which makes her the patron artist of indie authors. She is the
incredible voice behind one of my favorite songs of all time, “Breathe,” as
well as the lesser-known song “These Old Wings” that helped get me through the
worst depression of my entire life.
Can I just say,
aside from being wicked talented and a sweet, down-to-earth person who tells
stories during her concerts, it’s so amazing to see a successful artist humbly
admit to struggling with depression herself. It reminded me that it’s often a
source of great art, be it music or literature. I can never have enough of
those reminders. I want people to feel the same about my books the way I feel
about Anna’s music.
She talked about
autobiographical writing as a way of freezing yourself in time. Your beliefs
and personality may develop through the years, but when you put yourself out
there to be read or listened to, you are in a sense forever bound to who you
were at that time.
That’s how I feel about Confessions. That book was not intended to become a bestseller. Writing it was my way of processing through the conflict of adopting beliefs that are wildly different from the ones my parents taught me, so it reads very much like the journal of a confused woman who is gradually becoming aware of her inner strength. I do not have the same doubts or beliefs that I did when it was published. But I’ve also become stronger in certain beliefs I was shaky about at the time. I can still sense the turmoil when I flip through it every now and then.
That’s how I feel about Confessions. That book was not intended to become a bestseller. Writing it was my way of processing through the conflict of adopting beliefs that are wildly different from the ones my parents taught me, so it reads very much like the journal of a confused woman who is gradually becoming aware of her inner strength. I do not have the same doubts or beliefs that I did when it was published. But I’ve also become stronger in certain beliefs I was shaky about at the time. I can still sense the turmoil when I flip through it every now and then.
My writing has
greatly improved in the last two years, along with my knowledge of the
publishing industry and marketing (and in a rapidly changing industry like
this, there is always more to learn!). I had this idea that having a book
available for purchase meant it would sell on its own. I couldn’t be more
wrong! Despite working on my fifth book, I’m not beating myself up for not
being “bigger” than I’d like to be, since I only actively started marketing
when my third book was released last August. Confessions may remain my only
memoir for the time being, as I quite enjoy the freedom of inserting my own
experiences into my characters, without locking myself into a certain set of
beliefs or characteristics. I’m also aware that the average 25-year-old is not world-weary enough for more than one memoir (or even just
one).
But today feels
like a birthday. So from this day forward, I can only learn more.
Saturday, March 22, 2014
When hate begets grace
A funny thing
happened when I got engaged last weekend (cue the squeals!):
I was consumed with
so much joy at the thought of spending the rest of my life with a man I’m crazy
about (and get this guys, he actually feels the same!) that I forgot to be
bitter for the rest of the weekend.
You see, the
engagement happened during the 6-year anniversary of being assaulted; the 3-year
anniversary of ending the abusive relationship in which that assault occurred; and
the 11-year anniversary of when a friend of mine committed suicide. So needless
to say, the first few weeks of springtime are not typically joyous for me. In
fact, I dread them, for all the memories that come up.
And then – and then!
– Fred Phelps, the legendary patriarch of the hate-filled Westboro Baptist “church”
passed away. So I’ve been reading up on articles that keep cropping up on
Facebook about it, and it seems my internet friends’ reactions fall almost evenly in two
separate camps: those who want to piss on Fred’s grave and protest his funeral,
and those who insist on extending forgiveness and the hope of salvation to a
very, very lost individual.
I, like many
Christians, am not without bitterness towards people like Phelps: people who
make me ashamed to identify as “Christian” for all the ways that word has been
abused. Still, this man was someone’s father, grandfather, brother, husband…and
it saddens me that it’s not obvious to more people how protesting his funeral
isn’t justice; it’s only sinking to his level of depravity. I find myself increasingly
inspired by people who are choosing to extend grace and mercy on his behalf.
But I can’t have
those thoughts about Fred without doing some soul-searching about my feelings
towards the man who wronged me. I’ve wished for bad things to happen to him. I’ve
wished for the chance to humiliate him. But in the same way protesting Fred’s
funeral won’t undo the emotional damage caused by holding up signs saying “God
Hates Fags,” wishing terrible things on my abuser doesn’t undo what he did. And
it certainly doesn’t make me a happier, joy-filled person.
It’s giving him
permission to live rent-free inside my head. And there’s something about the
counter-protests like this one, plus getting engaged, that makes me think “Ain’t
nobody got time for that.”
It’s time to start
living. Time to accept that the past can’t be undone, and the memories may
still sting, but they don’t define me or determine the happiness I can choose
to feel. Time to start planning my wedding!
Friday, March 14, 2014
"We don't need feminism in America"
I was about to have
another one of my “Sarahbeth might be closeted liberal” moments earlier today,
based on my reaction from this blog a friend of mine shared on Facebook. The
blogger describes herself as being “Christian, anti-feminist, pro-patriarchy.”
Oy vey. My heart
definitely lurched into my throat when I read that.
But then I stepped
away from my laptop for a moment (smart move) and realized my outrage has
nothing to do with possibly being “liberal” or not. Or conservative, really. What do those labels
actually mean? My outrage stems from the complete ignorance of what feminism
is, based on the ways it’s being perverted in the media. It has an ugly side,
like all well-intentioned movements do. We can argue until we’re blue in the
face about whether feminists should support abortion, or be stay-at-home moms,
what have you. But Christian or atheist, male or female, I cannot understand
why it’s so hard for us to agree on the fact that women are people, and as
such, they deserve to be dignified.
Intelligent people
understand that just because some loudmouth politician who calls himself a
Christian is against gay rights (not just marriage, but against a homosexual
being fired simply for being homosexual) does not mean all Christians agree
with him.
Intelligent people
understand that one negative encounter with someone of a different race does
not mean all people of that race are bad.
Intelligent people
understand that the militant “feminazis” (a term I abhor) do not represent all
feminists. We are not out to supplant men, oppress them, or degrade them. Those
who do are missing the whole point.
My heart wants to
react violently when I hear people say, “We don’t need feminism in America!”
I’ll be honest and admit that I’m hesitant to use expressions like “war on
women” because life for women in this country is not nearly as oppressive as,
say, women in the Middle East who are assaulted with acid for the crime of
wanting to be educated. We are so blessed to not have to face that kind of
persecution here.
But that doesn’t
mean life is ideal for women in America. There are scores of men who are
running Congress who make extremely damaging remarks about domestic violence,
which influence society’s view of it as a whole. Those attitudes ruin lives.
They destroy the dignity of women’s souls. They hurt women, their children, and
create an attitude of shame that directly affects the impact they leave on this
world. You cannot operate out of shame and expect to live a productive life.
Sadly, more often that not, men with the utmost privilege, who cannot fathom
what it’s like to be judged by their clothing choices or their decision to work
outside the home, are the ones promoting these attitudes.
But it’s not just
men. Women like the creator of that blog have also bought the lie that the
entire feminist movement is damaging and irrelevant because politics have
gotten in the way of simply affirming humanity. Can we please go back to the
beginning, when it was decided that a movement was necessary to affirm the
humanity of women??
We need feminism in America. We need feminism in churches. We need feminism in every corner of the
world where there is even one iota of injustice. We need men who strive to dignify the women in their lives: their
wives, mothers, daughters, sisters. We need feminism to teach women that they
are more than vaginas. More than sex objects.
We need feminism,
period.
Wednesday, March 12, 2014
Is being liked overrated?
Here’s a shocking question I’ve been trying to process lately: is being liked an overrated goal?
As a self-published
author, putting my books out there to be loved or loathed by strangers, and
even subjecting myself to criticism from those who don’t think self-publishing
“counts,” I’d say the answer is yes.
There’s a
difference, though, between living your life with selfish abandon, not caring
at all about the legacy you’re leaving behind, and living your life with a
healthy sense of nonconformity.
I had a
misunderstanding with someone this week. It made me angry, upset, and tempted
to retaliate. I’m forcing myself to bite my tongue and carry on, because there
are times when people will be set on disliking me regardless of the effort I
make to clear my name. Sometimes I have to accept that the consequences from my
not-so-wise decisions will leave a sour taste in people’s mouths when they hear
my name. And that sucks. But ultimately, what can you do about it?
I know I’m not
always the nicest person. I’m even hesitant to label myself a good person, because I am the only one
with an uncensored view of what goes on in my head, and I'm all too aware of my tendency to judge, criticize, and condemn. I don’t accept that as a permanent feature of
myself that can’t be changed, but it helps me accept that my entire life is
basically a work in progress, which means being unliked is inevitable. Not
being able to change people’s minds is inevitable.
All that is to say,
being viciously protective of what people think will make you immobile. For
what it’s worth, maybe it’s better to not be liked by a few than go completely
unnoticed in this life.
Again I repeat, This is sanctification.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)